and... there is always the possibility that a flaw in the tool or a hacking event might turn it into something malicious that grabs personal info. If you willy nilly allow data to be sucked off your computer then be prepared for serious RL consequences.


+1 to the Dev's!

First, I believe you need to look up the definition of "bragging". I was not bragging, I was merely stating an example. Also, I'm not sure what game you're playing, but EVE is generally not a 'busy' game. Except during instances of combat, a lot of EVE can be played with it in a window with only one eye paying attention to things happening while you actually do useful things in another window.

Also, I am aware that it's my responsibility, which is why I was asking for the ability to opt into the data collection with the ability to review the data being sent so that I can verify what CCP is collecting and make the determination on if the data can be sent. The alternatives are to not load EVE while doing other things (which may be a blessing in some respects) or take actions to block their crash reporting system (which wouldn't be of benefit to anybody as they would then never receive a crash report as I would just set it and forget it).

I honestly don't get why people are still on about this. CCP said "Hey, awesome crash collection stuff coming up!" to which the question was asked "Is it optional?" CCP quite reasonably said "Oops, not now but we'll make it so!" and everything was fine. I would have preferred it be optional on launch but, again, a Dev gave a reasonable alternative if there were any reservations about the system until they could add the opt in, and again, everything was fine.

Then people came out of the woodwork with "if you have nothing to hide..." crap which is why some of us were giving examples of why we would indeed care. Regardless of how relevant you think they are, I do appreciate that CCP has addressed the concerns.

Actually, no, that's not what has us 'all jittery'. I'm fine with CCP getting a list of all my running applications (as I have said before), injected into EVE or not, so long as they are up-front about it (hell, Sreegs is welcome to show up at my place unannounced, crash on my couch and go through my computer himself looking for bots) so I can make the decision as to what applications to run at the same time as EVE. I also want the chance to review what they are sending as they currently have some ground to cover to regain my full trust in their statements.

It's all about informed consent balancing against the need for privacy.

this indeed can be a good base for a new tool to check for RMT. Regular autoupload of memory dump to eve servers, no optout, autoban if bot is found. simple :)